AGM Resolution proposal: WC_AGM2006_03

Discuss how IOMICA and IOM NCAs operate

Moderators: Pedro Egea, Gary Boell, Fred Rocha USA 33

Post Reply
Andy Stevenson
GBR NCA Officer
Posts: 772
Joined: 15 Sep 2005, 13:08
Location: UK

AGM Resolution proposal: WC_AGM2006_03

Post by Andy Stevenson » 15 Jul 2006, 19:45

A Proposal for a resolution for the 2006 AGM has been received:
Resolution:
WC_AGM2006_03

Proposing NCA / WC Member:
Anders Wallin (IOMICA VC Infocomms)

Proposal:
Change C 7.7(c)

From:
"(c) A headsail boom topping lift restraint line attached to, or passing around, the topping lift may be attached to and/or passed around any or all of the following: topping lift; headsail; headsail halyard; headsail stay."

To:
"(c) A headsail boom topping lift restraint line attached to, or passing around, the topping lift may be attached to and/or passed around any or all of the following: topping lift; headsail; headsail halyard; headsail stay; headsail boom."

Discussion:
Interpretation 2004-IOM-5 found that a rubber band used as a topping lift restraint line cannot be attached to the topping lift and then hooked around the boom. The proposed rule change would allow this simple and cheap use of a rubber band as a topping lift restraint line.

Exec notes:
This is a special resolution and will require a ballot of Certified Owners.
Posted here for discussion and general comment.
Andy Stevenson
"A little pain never hurt anyone!" Sam, aged 11

RoyL
Posts: 707
Joined: 15 Dec 2003, 21:03

Post by RoyL » 18 Jul 2006, 22:47

It seems that we have proposals from three sources on the jib topping lift line issue. In the best of all worlds it would be great if all linterested parties came up with a single measure for the class to vote on. If necessary, however, VC Technical will write or recomment a single measure.

At present the proposal by Anders seems the most straightforward but I am open to convincing.

Ken Dobbie
Posts: 173
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 21:01
Location: Hobart, Tasmania. AUS950

AGM Resolution Proposal WC_AGM2006_04

Post by Ken Dobbie » 19 Jul 2006, 05:38

I have seen some boats with both the elastic attached to the topping lift and a topping lift restraint line around the jib, an overkill which would seem to be illegal under Ander's motion.

The class rule was written at a time when the latter was generally the sole method of preventing the topping lift fouling and thus refers specifically to that method.

RoyL
Posts: 707
Joined: 15 Dec 2003, 21:03

Post by RoyL » 19 Jul 2006, 08:07

Ken: Any specific language you like?

Lester
Posts: 628
Joined: 14 Oct 2004, 22:29
Location: GBR 105
Contact:

Post by Lester » 19 Jul 2006, 08:36

What about changing F.6.2(b)(8) "Headsail boom topping lift restraint line" to read "Headsail boom topping lift restraint line(s)"?
Lester Gilbert
http://www.onemetre.net/

Ken Dobbie
Posts: 173
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 21:01
Location: Hobart, Tasmania. AUS950

AGM Resolution Proposal WC_AGM2006_04

Post by Ken Dobbie » 19 Jul 2006, 14:43

Hi Roy

The wording in the AUS proposal would permit both if this is what the majority want.

Regards


Ken

Steve Landeau
Posts: 256
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 07:25
Location: USA 12

Post by Steve Landeau » 19 Jul 2006, 22:21

Keep it simple: unrestricted.... unless of course one could come up with a good reason not be. As long as it only keeps the topper from slacking and catching on the spreader, it's good.
Steve Landeau
AMYA 10859
IOM USA 112
Finn USA 112
Cal 25 #548

Post Reply