We have completely in acoordance with all topics of your interventions...
Pls see the PRIVATE MESSAGES. We have send you a message a week ago....
Antonio.
Search found 55 matches
- 20 Jul 2011, 11:01
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Single Panel Molded Sails
- Replies: 90
- Views: 305007
- 09 Jul 2011, 00:39
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Single Panel Molded Sails
- Replies: 90
- Views: 305007
Re: Single Panel Molded Sails
If the general membership votes to allow moulded sails, IMHO, the rules regarding sails should be re-written to specify allowable materials, specific requirements
Pls read the IMM of ISAF.... page number 96 about Ply and others...(you say that this Manual exists? Are you read?)
What is the need ...
Pls read the IMM of ISAF.... page number 96 about Ply and others...(you say that this Manual exists? Are you read?)
What is the need ...
- 04 Jul 2011, 22:54
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Single Panel Molded Sails
- Replies: 90
- Views: 305007
Re: Single Panel Molded Sails
I have to warn you all I'm going to say next, is "politically incorrect" but I will tell their personal capacity:
1 - RoyL, assumes (and warns) the outcome of the consultation Zvonko ...
2 - RoyL, was from 2006 to 2009 to include inthe rulebook prohibitive resolution 2003 (which incidentally also ...
1 - RoyL, assumes (and warns) the outcome of the consultation Zvonko ...
2 - RoyL, was from 2006 to 2009 to include inthe rulebook prohibitive resolution 2003 (which incidentally also ...
- 24 Jun 2011, 16:48
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 31641
Re: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
¿No answer to my questions?
Wath is the reason that any person protests for a resolution made by a external IOMICA instance, contrary to the oficial issued from Robert Grubisa, if this instance has exactly the same level of profesionality that Robert?
Or is it a question of political positions?
Wath is the reason that any person protests for a resolution made by a external IOMICA instance, contrary to the oficial issued from Robert Grubisa, if this instance has exactly the same level of profesionality that Robert?
Or is it a question of political positions?
- 23 Jun 2011, 23:50
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Single Panel Molded Sails
- Replies: 90
- Views: 305007
Re: Single Panel Molded Sails
With all due respect to all previous comments, I feel to be in complete disagreement with the majority:
Facts:
1 - Sails have passed the measurement control of the championship
2 - No one filed any protest
Conclusion:
No place or rezoning, or anything similar disqualifications
In the event ...
Facts:
1 - Sails have passed the measurement control of the championship
2 - No one filed any protest
Conclusion:
No place or rezoning, or anything similar disqualifications
In the event ...
- 15 Mar 2011, 12:34
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 31641
Re: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
I speak solely as a measurer.
The second resolution to which I referred in my previous post, is totally inconsistent not only with the first (which in my opinion was correct) but with the class rules as they are written today.
An inverted T rudder built in ONE PIECE, not Arrangements is completely ...
The second resolution to which I referred in my previous post, is totally inconsistent not only with the first (which in my opinion was correct) but with the class rules as they are written today.
An inverted T rudder built in ONE PIECE, not Arrangements is completely ...
- 15 Mar 2011, 12:22
- Forum: Measurement and Measurers
- Topic: Dry or Waterless Measuring
- Replies: 14
- Views: 48057
Re: Dry or Waterless Measuring
Hi Lawrie:
Very good project and Video...
Are you the protagonist?
We send you a mail with the legal problems with the actual RuleBook... if you obtains a new text and general consense... ¡congratulations!.
Has you see the work of Roy Thompson 3-4 years ago?
Regards.
Very good project and Video...
Are you the protagonist?
We send you a mail with the legal problems with the actual RuleBook... if you obtains a new text and general consense... ¡congratulations!.
Has you see the work of Roy Thompson 3-4 years ago?
Regards.
- 14 Mar 2011, 18:52
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 31641
Re: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
I understand that the first interpretation is not according to the new rules 2011 ???
The second resolution is signed by Val Provoost and Remi Bres (from IRSA)...Not by Robert Grubisa...
Pls informs that IRSA has the posibility to modify a resolution of our Vice-chairman (Technical).
The second resolution is signed by Val Provoost and Remi Bres (from IRSA)...Not by Robert Grubisa...
Pls informs that IRSA has the posibility to modify a resolution of our Vice-chairman (Technical).
- 02 Oct 2010, 21:23
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 31641
Re: Interpretation of IOM CR: rudders arrangement
Is posible see a graphic of the two proposals?
- 01 Oct 2009, 13:45
- Forum: General IOM
- Topic: IOM in ISAF
- Replies: 198
- Views: 300529
- 28 Sep 2009, 22:51
- Forum: General IOM
- Topic: IOM in ISAF
- Replies: 198
- Views: 300529
- 28 Aug 2009, 07:29
- Forum: General IOM
- Topic: IOM in ISAF
- Replies: 198
- Views: 300529
- 28 Aug 2009, 00:14
- Forum: General IOM
- Topic: IOM in ISAF
- Replies: 198
- Views: 300529
- 29 Jul 2009, 05:42
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Election Reform
- Replies: 35
- Views: 63927
The difference between registered and certified, is that "someone" has "seen" the object of the class, which is nothing less than "a boat of Class 1M".
I can registered,( for example), my project of buying a lintel, and should not be entitled to vote, until he is able to navigate to it (unless you ...
I can registered,( for example), my project of buying a lintel, and should not be entitled to vote, until he is able to navigate to it (unless you ...
- 28 Jul 2009, 10:04
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Election Reform
- Replies: 35
- Views: 63927
- 27 Jul 2009, 22:25
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Election Reform
- Replies: 35
- Views: 63927
- 27 Jul 2009, 21:42
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Election Reform
- Replies: 35
- Views: 63927
- 26 Jul 2009, 17:57
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Election Reform
- Replies: 35
- Views: 63927
- 25 Jul 2009, 20:04
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Election Reform
- Replies: 35
- Views: 63927
- 14 Jul 2009, 16:15
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Results of 2009 AGM
- Replies: 41
- Views: 75722
- 13 Jul 2009, 23:48
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Results of 2009 AGM
- Replies: 41
- Views: 75722
- 11 Jul 2009, 22:42
- Forum: Class Associations and Class Management
- Topic: Results of 2009 AGM
- Replies: 41
- Views: 75722
- 03 Jul 2009, 12:01
- Forum: Measurement and Measurers
- Topic: MEASURER IN CHARGE AT BARBADOS WORLD CUP
- Replies: 16
- Views: 51874
- 01 Jun 2009, 10:02
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: G.3.4 ON RULEBOOK
- Replies: 38
- Views: 63075
- 31 May 2009, 12:16
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: G.3.4 ON RULEBOOK
- Replies: 38
- Views: 63075
I note the following:
With the current wording of the regulation and measurement sheet, a certificate of measurement is limited to being merely an administrative formality.
If a rule as simple as that led to this thread in the forum, has led to many answers is that less is badly written. (Whatever ...
With the current wording of the regulation and measurement sheet, a certificate of measurement is limited to being merely an administrative formality.
If a rule as simple as that led to this thread in the forum, has led to many answers is that less is badly written. (Whatever ...
- 29 May 2009, 10:45
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: G.3.4 ON RULEBOOK
- Replies: 38
- Views: 63075
Roy:
My impression is that the rules have been re-writing as it has been necessary.
What is the point if not keep in your measurement form of the hull as a question 6.D.2. (1) (3) that since 2004 does not apply?. (texalium)
We may blinkers, but without mentioning the manufacturers, and with about ...
My impression is that the rules have been re-writing as it has been necessary.
What is the point if not keep in your measurement form of the hull as a question 6.D.2. (1) (3) that since 2004 does not apply?. (texalium)
We may blinkers, but without mentioning the manufacturers, and with about ...
- 28 May 2009, 18:22
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: G.3.4 ON RULEBOOK
- Replies: 38
- Views: 63075
- 28 May 2009, 16:46
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: G.3.4 ON RULEBOOK
- Replies: 38
- Views: 63075
- 27 May 2009, 16:34
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: G.3.4 ON RULEBOOK
- Replies: 38
- Views: 63075
- 27 May 2009, 13:13
- Forum: Class Rules
- Topic: G.3.4 ON RULEBOOK
- Replies: 38
- Views: 63075